Citizen portals, administrative software, town hall: pentests with a report that serves as a basis for NIS2 and ITSiV-PV.
It did not hit a big city with its own IT, but the normal case: municipalities with a shared provider.
Based on public reporting (including heise online). Access Granted was not involved in this incident.
A single compromised access is enough for all of them. The letters show the points where we test.
Where we startOnline applications for ID cards, vehicles or housing benefit: directly attackable.
Registration, social benefits, building authority: grown over years, hard to replace.
VPN access and segmentation. That is where Südwestfalen-IT was hit.
Open service counters and contact with citizens make pretexting easier.
Federal administration under section 29 BSIG, states and municipalities under state law.
The ITSiV-PV requires web checks and pentests before connection and at least every three years, by the BSI, state authorities or BSI-certified providers.
Both obligations apply regardless of whether a municipality runs its own IT or sources it from a provider.
Administrative processes and procurement law run differently than in the private sector. That is why you get a list of what you can firmly expect from us.
A clear scope of work, a fixed price, a traceable cost breakdown. We define the scope together beforehand.
We tailor scope and offer so they can stay below the relevant thresholds, or we provide the documents as the basis for a formal tender.
The report documents web checks and penetration test following the BSI specifications, as a basis for your ITSiV-PV and NIS2 evidence.
For the duration of the test, a contact person is named on both sides. Should a critical risk come to light, we inform you immediately.
Destructive tests are ruled out, we agree test windows with you in advance, and the ongoing services for citizens remain untouched.
Citizen portals and application workflows.
Segmentation and VPN access.
Phishing and pretexting.
Entry to town hall and server room.
What sits with you, and what with the provider? After that, a fixed-price quote.
Manual, within the agreed scope, test windows coordinated. Critical findings are reported immediately.
Every finding is rated by severity and by the impact it has on citizen services.
Final report as a basis for ITSiV-PV and NIS2
Management summary for IT leadership, department heads and administrative leadership
Prioritised list of measures, separated by municipality and provider
Certificate with reference code, verifiable online
For services delivered through the OZG portal network, the ITSiV-PV requires web checks and penetration tests. NIS2 comes on top: for the federal level via section 29 BSIG, for states via state law; whether municipalities are covered is up to each state.
Our offers are suitable for direct awards below the relevant thresholds as well as the basis for a formal tender: a clear scope of work, a fixed price, a traceable cost breakdown.
We clarify that during scoping. In practice, part sits with the municipality (administrative software, endpoints, citizen office) and part with the provider (network, server operations, VPN). The test scope follows your actual responsibility, coordinated with the provider where needed.
The Südwestfalen-IT case shows the opposite: the target was the shared IT provider that more than 100 municipalities were connected to. If you run on shared infrastructure, you also share its attack surface.
In 30 minutes we clarify your scope and what counts for NIS2 and ITSiV-PV. After that, a procurement-compliant fixed-price quote.
All details on the sector: access-granted.de/en/branchen/publicsector