We send realistic phishing emails to your employees and analyse who opens them, who clicks, who enters credentials and who reports them.
Sources: Verizon DBIR 2026/2024, KnowBe4 2026 (vendor data). What happens at your organisation, only your own campaign shows.
Looks like M365, the VPN portal or your intranet. Or simply a notice page instead: this was a test.
A domain that resembles yours, or a well-known service such as Microsoft or DHL. We set it up ourselves.
It decides whether the email gets opened at all. That is how we judge how well it worked.
Anyone who opens the link is recorded. The key figure.
Word, Excel or PDF with simulated macros. No malicious code, but we see who opens it.
Anyone who types a username and password here shows the real risk of a data leak. We do not store real passwords.
The report rate. Anyone who passes the attempt on to IT instead of ignoring it turns an incident into a warning for everyone else. It is the only rate that should go up, and it says more about your security culture than any click figure.
Sent to everyone or to selected departments. Delivers the overall click rate as a baseline.
Personalised with name, role and real project references. This is how APT groups work.
A simulated payment order from the board. Shows whether dual control and callback rules are actually followed.
After the click comes the deceptively real login page. We capture every entry made there.
Macros and links in the document, no malicious code, fully tracked.
Email, login page, capture, simulated lateral move.
Awareness measures are required by several frameworks. The report shows whether they work and can go straight into your audit documentation.
Departments, scenarios, exclusions and the legal framework.
Emails, domains, landing pages and tracking for your environment.
Sent on schedule. We monitor continuously and get in touch immediately.
All tracking data broken down by department, location and scenario.
Audit-ready, with industry comparison, risk groups and measures.
Click, entry and report rates, broken down by department, location and scenario
Industry comparison and the risk groups you should start with
When the clicks happened: in the morning, under time pressure, just before the end of the day
Management summary and concrete measures, usable for audit documentation
We deliver the simulation and the evidence, not legal advice.
An example of how the report is structured, not measured values (except for the KnowBe4 comparison). The report rate of 8% would be the first place to start, the target is above 60%.
Two to four simulations a year with changing scenarios keep awareness high. For audits, what counts is that you measure awareness regularly and adjust.
The click rate alone changes nothing. We go through the figures with you and work out what makes sense next: a refresher for everyone, training for the departments that stood out, or a live hacking session that recreates exactly this email. More at access-granted.de/en/training.
Yes, that is the point: announced, the test only measures the caution right afterwards, not everyday behaviour. It is permissible within a clean framework: works council involved, results only at group level.
We write them by hand and research your tool stack, language and current projects via OSINT beforehand. Templates are no good for this.
Platforms send mass simulations from templates. With us, every scenario is built for your organisation, and at the end you get an audit-ready report instead of a dashboard.
Yes. Email, credential entry, physical access with the captured data, movement through the network. We build chains like this on request.
In a free initial call we agree scope and scenarios.